loading
reading
writing
saving
searching
Waterpump 2 liter I4 Chrysler Dodge Plymouth Mitsubishi - $18 (Round Rock)
QR Code Link to This Post
This is available. Email me through CL relay.
4 Cyl - 2.0 Liter 1996 CC 122 Cubic Inch Standard Pump Naturally Aspirated (not 2.4L engines).
There are two variants of the 1995 to 2005 2.0L engine: SOHC (Single Overhead Cam). DOHC (Double Overhead Cam). Both the 2.0L SOHC and DOHC engines utilize the same water pump, compatible with various models from 1995 to 2005. Both engine types share the same water pump ensuring interchangeable between the two. As a side note although the water pump are the same, timing belt and other parts such as valve cover gasket, seals etc are likely different between the two engines.
Fits these vehicles:
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Chrysler Sebring
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Dodge Avenger
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Dodge Stratus
2000 Chrysler Cirrus
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Dodge Neon (2L not 2.4L engine)
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse the Mitsubishi Eclipse models, specifically the RS and GS trims, were equipped with a Chrysler 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine known as the 420A. This engine was part of a collaboration between Mitsubishi and Chrysler during that time.
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Plymouth Breeze
1995 1996 1997 1998 Eagle Talon model version with the 2.0L I4 Chrysler 420A engine naturally aspirated.
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Plymouth Neon
2000 2001 2002 Chrysler Neon
2003 2004 2005 Dodge SX 2.0
Comparison of Water Pump Drive Pulley Materials
Durability and Performance
Feature Plastic Teeth Metal Alloy Teeth
Durability Less durable, prone to wear and tear over time More durable, withstands stress better
Heat Resistance Lower resistance, can deform under high temperatures High resistance, maintains shape under heat
Chemical Resistance Susceptible to degradation from coolants Highly resistant to chemical breakdown
Weight Lighter, which can be beneficial for some applications Heavier, but adds stability and strength
Maintenance and Longevity
Aspect Plastic Teeth Metal Alloy Teeth
Lifespan Shorter lifespan, may require more frequent replacements Longer lifespan, less frequent replacements needed
Maintenance May need regular checks for wear Generally requires less maintenance
Cost Considerations
Cost Factor Plastic Teeth Metal Alloy Teeth
Initial Cost Lower initial cost Higher initial cost
Long-term Cost Potentially higher due to replacements Lower long-term cost due to durability
Metal alloy teeth are generally considered superior due to their durability, heat resistance, and longer lifespan. While they may have a higher initial cost, they often provide better long-term value and reliability in demanding conditions.